ARB workbench

Run your architecture review board on the record, from submission to decision to follow-up action.

Decisions with reasons

Votes inform. The Chair decides.

Members record their votes. The ARB Chair makes the decision. If the vote was not unanimous, the Chair must record the reasoning, so the board never has to reconstruct why.

Approve

The proposal proceeds as submitted.

Approve with caveats

It proceeds, and every caveat becomes a tracked action with an owner.

Defer

More information is needed before a decision can be made.

Reject

It does not proceed, and the reasons are held with the item.

Scored against your own standards

Every item assessed against the chain.

Linked to the repository

Proposals reference the real elements they affect, so the board sees impact and not a description of it.

Scored consistently

Scoring against principles, standards, policies and patterns is attached to the item for the board to see.

Actions that do not vanish

Caveats become tracked actions, so a conditional approval is followed through.

See how Lintel EA would model your governance.

A short briefing, tailored to the way your architecture board actually works.